From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32163 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2002 20:45:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32148 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2002 20:45:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO valrhona.uglyboxes.com) (64.1.192.220) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Sep 2002 20:45:33 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:tee6OxnpHUzjKzx7LfwWyuvv4FYf38Qv@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by valrhona.uglyboxes.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8HKmFG11242 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:48:16 -0700 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:45:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: keiths@valrhona.uglyboxes.com To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/MI testsuite] test varobj type changing In-Reply-To: <3D878A18.4050209@ges.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00368.txt.bz2 On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Yes ok (and actually i think you and fernando are the ones to figure out > if a change to this file is valid -- it just so happens that MI can test > varobj). Committed (sans the copyright stuff). Thank you for the quick review. Keith