From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6864 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2002 18:56:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6856 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2002 18:56:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO valrhona.uglyboxes.com) (64.1.192.220) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2002 18:56:29 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:bagQ3gNtoXXMdFa7TKBICiUaKF2H8qht@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by valrhona.uglyboxes.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8GIxAb01947; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:59:10 -0700 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 11:56:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: keiths@valrhona.uglyboxes.com To: Fernando Nasser cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/MI testsuite] gdb/701 test (varobj) In-Reply-To: <3D8281AE.8090505@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00312.txt.bz2 On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Fernando Nasser wrote: > As you are at it, canyou take a look at this old patch of mine that I've > found lost in a branch.... Something should be broken without it! I can take a look at it. It seems to me that this looks plausible. I'll see if I can add some more test which check the type-changing stuff. As I recall, we've historically had some problems with this code. Having a testcase should clear things up. Keith