From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31089 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2002 16:21:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31082 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2002 16:21:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO valrhona.uglyboxes.com) (64.1.192.220) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2002 16:21:35 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:0h+H3C7HnwVwrNO7XI7yVw8hwT2CnsJu@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by valrhona.uglyboxes.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8GGOGb01712; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 09:24:16 -0700 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 09:21:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: keiths@valrhona.uglyboxes.com To: Elena Zannoni cc: fnasser@redhat.com, Subject: Re: [RFA/MI testsuite] Add pthreads tests In-Reply-To: <15748.56497.711652.479802@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00311.txt.bz2 On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Elena Zannoni wrote: > I wonder if we should name the file gdb669.exp. The file tests more than just gdb/669: it tests all of the MI thread commands. I have more tests for this file which test the syncronization of the MI and console command interpreters. I would add the setup_kfail bit, as Fernando recommends, but I'm afraid that the tests are rather undeterministic when it comes to gdb/669 -- any one of the checks for the syncronization could fail. (Maybe it doesn't matter?) > OK otherwise. I'll wait to here from Fernando or you on the kfail bit, and then I'll commit it (and submit a patch to fix gdb/669). Keith