From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25378 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2002 21:39:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25371 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2002 21:39:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO valrhona.uglyboxes.com) (64.1.192.220) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2002 21:39:53 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:VYh9AC4klEp/IGk95OObGyUNdnQSUrjK@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by valrhona.uglyboxes.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8BLgZK05004; Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:42:35 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:39:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: keiths@valrhona.uglyboxes.com To: Elena Zannoni cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/A] gdb/680: ui_out_reset? In-Reply-To: <15743.46402.624640.843168@localhost.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > How's this patch look? It doesn't cause an regressions and fixes gdb/680. > > > > there is a testcase for this, right? Yes, gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/gdb680.exp. So okay to check this in? Keith