From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14276 invoked by alias); 28 Aug 2002 15:41:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14269 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2002 15:41:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO valrhona.uglyboxes.com) (64.1.192.220) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Aug 2002 15:41:34 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:0OPvE0JkSvae9YeQuIOcvbGAEJXZpeFM@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by valrhona.uglyboxes.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7SFiHA01787 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:44:17 -0700 Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:51:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: keiths@valrhona.uglyboxes.com To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] add selected-frame-level-changed events In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00940.txt.bz2 On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Keith Seitz wrote: > > As for the unnecessary select frame calls, I guess ``we'' are working on > > it. I suspect that varobj could do with an audit --- use FRAME_ID() and > > frame parameterized versions of various functions. > > Hmmm... Patch coming. Sigh, varobj seems to already use frame_ids, but not any frame-parameterized functions. Ahh, well, that's because there are none (yet?)! I guess a patch won't be coming any time soon, then! :-( Keith