From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Cc: Petr Sorfa <petrs@caldera.com>, <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] DW_AT_calling_convention support
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207101443450.15783-100000@dberlin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <npr8ibxw79.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
> > "The DW_CC_program value is intended to support Fortran main programs.
> > It is not intended as
> > a way of finding the entry address for the program."
> >
> > So the answer is yes and no. But I think the patch is valid as it
> > determines not the entry point, but the main program. As far as I am
> > aware you can have only one PROGRAM entry per FORTRAN program. If there
> > is more than one found, the patch just uses the last read entry. I don't
> > think supporting a more intricate way would be much use (such as keeping
> > a list of DW_CC_program entries.)
>
> What's the difference between the entry point and the main program?
I would imagine the thinking is executables that can act as both shared
libs, and as main programs (IE they have one entry point used when loaded
as a module, one when used as loaded as a program).
A not-so-clear example of this would be a C++ program that can act as a
shared lib and an executable.
As a shared lib, it probably has some automatically run by the
runtime linker entry point that deals with exception registration and
whatnot, but as a main program, this is probably done from main.
Thus, the main program is "main", but the entry points are "main" and
"initialize_exceptions".
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-10 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-09 14:08 Petr Sorfa
2002-07-09 14:24 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-09 14:58 ` Petr Sorfa
2002-07-09 15:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-10 7:03 ` Petr Sorfa
2002-07-10 7:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-10 7:25 ` Petr Sorfa
2002-07-10 8:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-10 9:07 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-10 10:00 ` Petr Sorfa
2002-07-10 10:18 ` Petr Sorfa
2002-07-10 10:33 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-10 11:32 ` Petr Sorfa
2002-07-10 11:47 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-10 11:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-10 12:35 ` Jim Blandy
2002-07-10 12:27 ` Daniel Berlin [this message]
2002-07-10 8:26 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0207101443450.15783-100000@dberlin.org \
--to=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=petrs@caldera.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox