From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6009 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2002 14:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5947 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2002 14:54:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.dberlin.org) (138.88.48.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Jun 2002 14:54:25 -0000 Received: by www.dberlin.org (Postfix, from userid 503) id 4ABD01805945; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:54:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www.dberlin.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F5518005FB for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:54:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 07:54:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Waiting for review since April Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=X_NOT_PRESENT,NO_MX_FOR_FROM,AWL version=2.30 X-Spam-Level: X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00299.txt.bz2 Could someone take a look at http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-04/msg00432.html, please? Feel free to evaluate the loc_computed/loc_computed_arg portion separate from the dwarf2 portion, i can split the patch if necessary, but i'm not going to bother if it's not going to be looked at. The loc_computed/loc_computed_arg is an implementation of Jim's spec that he posted, so any complaints on the idea itself/the structure in symtab.h (which was cut and pasted from his email), should probably go to him. As the patch mentions, it was tested on multiple platforms. --Dan