From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1122 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2002 20:45:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1094 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2002 20:45:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ma103.mailarmory.com) (216.17.222.195) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jun 2002 20:45:20 -0000 Received: from deimos.frii.net (deimos.frii.com [216.17.128.2]) by ma103.mailarmory.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g58KjJsZ027159 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 14:45:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from ari-co11-32.rasserver.net (ari-co11-32.rasserver.net [204.32.196.32]) by deimos.frii.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g58KjHvk053700 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 14:45:17 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 13:45:00 -0000 From: "Theodore A. Roth" X-X-Sender: troth@bozoland.mynet cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] update NEWS and MAINTAINERS for avr. In-Reply-To: <3D025289.2070009@cygnus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 Hi, I have committed this. Ted Roth On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I never got a response on this. I just wanted to know if I should word >> this differently: >> >> >>>+*** Changes since GDB 5.2: >> >> >> This patch is for the 5.2 branch. I might not have made that clear before. >> >> I'm still sitting on this and if I don't get an approval by tuesday it >> will have to wait a week or two while I move across country. ;-) > >Sorry, yes. Any maintainer can update NEWS (given no one commented, I'd >assume everyone is ok), and yes you should be mentioned as maintainer. > >Andrew > > > >