From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-15441-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8884 invoked by alias); 13 May 2002 19:54:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8798 invoked from network); 13 May 2002 19:54:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO www.dberlin.org) (151.204.248.14)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 May 2002 19:54:30 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by www.dberlin.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A757F4CC6D23; Mon, 13 May 2002 15:54:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 12:54:00 -0000
From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: i Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>,
	<gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Type cleanups
In-Reply-To: <20020513184651.GA16618@nevyn.them.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205131544530.21539-100000@dberlin.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00489.txt.bz2

> > cache, and no one has noticed me adding another assertion to every 
> > gdbarch accessor function, I don't expect changing the above to opaque 
> > to be a significant problem :-)
> 
> I think you may be underestimating the frequency of some of the TYPE
> accessors... but if I get a chance, I'll benchmark it.
If worst comes to worst, you can always make them static inlines in the 
header.
That way, you can still debug them easily, but if optimization is on, ....
--Dan