Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore A. Roth" <troth@verinet.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: typos in gdbint.texinfo
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 09:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204101031090.24259-100000@bozoland.mynet> (raw)

Found these while skimming through gdbint.info.

Ted Roth

	* gdbint.texinfo (Releasing GDB): Fix some typos.

Index: gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo,v
retrieving revision 1.72
diff -u -p -r1.72 gdbint.texinfo
--- gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo	6 Apr 2002 00:02:52 -0000	1.72
+++ gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo	10 Apr 2002 16:12:42 -0000
@@ -4628,7 +4628,7 @@ symbol to write conditional code which s
 such hosts.
 
 @findex IS_DIR_SEPARATOR
-@item IS_DIR_SEPARATOR (@var{c}
+@item IS_DIR_SEPARATOR (@var{c})
 Evaluates to a non-zero value if @var{c} is a directory separator
 character.  On Unix and GNU/Linux systems, only a slash @file{/} is
 such a character, but on Windows, both @file{/} and @file{\} will
@@ -4930,7 +4930,7 @@ The @file{gdb/MAINTAINERS} file still ho
 @item
 Don't fix something on the branch unless/until it is also fixed in the
 trunk.  If this isn't possible, mentioning it in the @file{gdb/PROBLEMS}
-file is better than committing a hack
+file is better than committing a hack.
 @item
 When considering a patch for the branch, suggested criteria include:
 Does it fix a build?  Does it fix the sequence @kbd{break main; run}
@@ -4953,8 +4953,8 @@ reason) support for a new host are consi
 @section Obsolete any code
 
 Before anything else, poke the other developers (and around the source
-code) to see there is anything that can be removed from @value{GDBN} (an
-old target, an unused file).
+code) to see if there is anything that can be removed from @value{GDBN}
+(an old target, an unused file).
 
 Obsolete code is identified by adding an @code{OBSOLETE} prefix to every
 line.  Doing this means that it is easy to identify obsolete code when


             reply	other threads:[~2002-04-10 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-10  9:30 Theodore A. Roth [this message]
2002-04-10  9:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-10 10:41   ` Theodore A. Roth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0204101031090.24259-100000@bozoland.mynet \
    --to=troth@verinet.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox