From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21957 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2002 20:20:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21948 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 20:20:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (64.246.6.106) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 20:20:08 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dberlin.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g34KJxm18358; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 15:19:59 -0500 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 12:20:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: Andrew Cagney cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , Elena Zannoni , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , Subject: Re: [RFA] import drow dbxread.c fix to branch In-Reply-To: <3CACB51F.2030001@cygnus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > I'm not sure. That code assumes a different meaning of line==0 than > > the one we're using. Particularly, if I understand correctly, the > > meaning in gdbtk comes from a set of Cygnus-internal stabs for handling > > live range splitting, which never made it into any public GCC ... > > ``Would not be accepted into FSF's official GCC sources?''. I'm trying > to find out what the status actually is. Is that a question (IE are you querying whether it would be accepted, and what the status in the official gcc is?) If so, I can answer it. > > Andrew >