From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32284 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2002 21:12:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32269 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2002 21:12:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dberlin.org) (64.246.6.106) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Apr 2002 21:12:27 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dberlin.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g32LCQm06082; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 16:12:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 13:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: Jim Blandy , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let dwarf2 CFI's execute_stack_op be used outside of CFI In-Reply-To: <20020402145750.A8031@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00039.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:46:39PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > However, it's > > > exceedingly unlikely we could get the copyright assigned to the FSF. > > So? > > So it would be a royal pain in the ass to distribute with GDB and > include as part of GDB. The FSF "doesn't like it when we do that". > That's existing policy, like it or not. Well, let's ask dave anderson if he's willing to assign copyright, since AFAIK, he's the sole author of libdwarf. --Dan