Re: [RFA] Avoid recursivly defined user functions.

Eli Zaretskii
2002-04-13T08:44:43Z

> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Don Howard <dhoward@redhat.com>
>
> +@kindex show max-user-call-depth
> +@kindex set max-user-call-depth
> +@item show max-user-call-depth
> +@item set max-user-call-depth

The second @item should be @itemx. In general, all the @item's but
the first one should be @itemx when they all pertain to the same entry
in the @table (or in @itemize list). This is so the produced text
looks like this:

[previous text]

show max-user-call-depth
set max-user-call-depth
The value of `max-user-call-depth' controls how many...

instead of this:

[previous text]

show max-user-call-depth

set max-user-call-depth
The value of `max-user-call-depth' controls how many...

where the extra line between the two @item's makes the first one look
as if the following text doesn't apply to it.

> +The value of @code{max-user-call-depth} controls how many levels deep a
> +user-defined call chain can go.

Perhaps this text is a bit more clear:

The value of @code{max-user-call-depth} controls how many recursion
levels are allowed in user-defined commands before GDB suspects an
infinite recursion and aborts the command.