Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Partial support for dwarf3 DW_AT_ranges
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 07:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201041020020.21870-100000@dberlin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011231003448.A3399@redhat.com>

On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Richard Henderson wrote:

> GCC began emitting DW_AT_ranges back in September to deal with
> lexical scopes made discontiguous by basic block reordering.
> 
> As of today, it may also create discontiguous lexical scopes
> due to scheduling.  (Before today under the same circumstances
> we'd lose track of which instructions belonged to which scope
> and fail to emit any debug information whatsoever.)
> 
> However, GDB doesn't recognize DW_AT_ranges as a valid way of
> marking a lexical scope, which causes it to discard the scope
> entirely.  Which is probably the least useful thing that could
> be done.
> 
> The following does not add proper support for discontiguous
> address ranges.  I couldn't figure out how to do that in any
> way that wasn't horribly invasive.  
Horribly invasive to the dwarf2 reader, or to other pieces of gdb?



  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-04 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-31  0:34 Richard Henderson
2002-01-04  7:20 ` Daniel Berlin [this message]
2002-01-04  9:13   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-04  9:48     ` Richard Henderson
2002-01-04  9:47 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-01-29 15:53   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-29 18:09     ` Elena Zannoni
2003-01-29 21:27       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-29 22:44         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-02-04 14:59           ` Elena Zannoni
2003-02-04 15:05             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-30  0:51       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-30  1:02         ` Elena Zannoni
2003-01-30  1:52           ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0201041020020.21870-100000@dberlin.org \
    --to=dan@cgsoftware.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox