From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13070 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2001 04:49:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13048 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2001 04:49:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.cgsoftware.com) (208.155.65.221) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2001 04:49:54 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.cgsoftware.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA07392; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:49:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Berlin To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain cc: , , , , Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes In-Reply-To: <200111280438.WAA13847@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > And I would be happy to run tests against v2 and v3 C++ compilers > and report the results. Most of my time is only on weekends though. > > The trouble with the gdb C++ code is that it's not logic bugs, it's > perverse data structures where each bug fix may not affect the > test results much. Almost. It's perverse logic combined with shoehorned data structures. Or was that shoehorned logic combined with perverse data structures. Hmmm. > So Jim's judgement is much more useful than > my mechanical test results. > > Michael C > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Berlin To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: , , , , Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <200111280438.WAA13847@duracef.shout.net> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00528.html Message-ID: <20011127204900.yyRrVPy_XxjD1Vp7RlZaqi8Y3GuefySizRMhoRgaM48@z> On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > And I would be happy to run tests against v2 and v3 C++ compilers > and report the results. Most of my time is only on weekends though. > > The trouble with the gdb C++ code is that it's not logic bugs, it's > perverse data structures where each bug fix may not affect the > test results much. Almost. It's perverse logic combined with shoehorned data structures. Or was that shoehorned logic combined with perverse data structures. Hmmm. > So Jim's judgement is much more useful than > my mechanical test results. > > Michael C >