From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26921 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2002 20:53:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26807 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2002 20:53:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nerodeguest) (24.161.107.98) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2002 20:53:45 -0000 Received: from neroden (helo=localhost) by nerodeguest with local-esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16f5eX-00042r-00; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:53:49 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:53:00 -0000 From: Nathanael Nerode X-Sender: neroden@nerodeguest To: Stan Shebs cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: is my spu patch acceptable? In-Reply-To: <3C54CAC3.FE3D0CA2@apple.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00679.txt.bz2 I'd like to know if my patch to autoconfiscate SPU has been accepted, or if more information or modification is needed. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-01/msg00755.html I'm waiting on this before finishing the whole copyright assignment thing, and also I'd like to get this in before I submit my patch to autoconfiscate the utils subdirectory, which I would like accepted before I sumbit my big top level autoconfiscation patches to gcc. --Nathanael Nerode