From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jimmy Guo To: Fernando Nasser Cc: Geoff Keating , gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: Re: recent dejagnu changes Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 10:09:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <398C3E91.D0EDB934@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-08/msg00140.html I will submit a patch retaining the *dir_to_run change, and let Geoff try it in GCC testing to make sure it works. The solution to support both existing GCC and GDB test trees would be to eliminate ${test_top_dirs} entries with common path prefix after ${srcdir} (keeping the parent only). I will cook up a separate patch for this. - Jimmy On Sat, 5 Aug 2000, Fernando Nasser wrote: >Geoff Keating wrote: >> >> > Actually, the dir_to_run and cmdline_dir_to_run change is OK ... that >> > allows specification of a list of test suites, instead of one at a time. >> >We do want to retain this functionality. > >> Could you post these as a separate patch, and test them separately? >> They were committed together, and it's difficult to know which part >> of the commit belongs with which change. >> >Better than that would be if Jimmy submitted a patch commenting out (with the >explanation why) the code that he believes is the offending one. If that passes >the gcc testsuite tests we commit it. > >I wonder if there isn't a way to accomodate both the gcc tree structure and the HP one...