From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30784 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2002 03:47:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30777 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2002 03:47:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2002 03:47:55 -0000 Received: from makita.cygnus.com (makita.sfbay.redhat.com [192.168.30.83]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA06312; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 20:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (keiths@localhost) by makita.cygnus.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.6.4) with ESMTP id UAA17763; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 20:47:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: makita.cygnus.com: keiths owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 22:33:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: To: Mo DeJong cc: , Subject: Re: [Patch] add implementation of stack-info-frame MI command In-Reply-To: <20020725192807.0599e403.supermo@bayarea.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00531.txt.bz2 On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Mo DeJong wrote: > It would? I was under the impression that -stack-info-depth would return > the number of frames on the stack without taking what the current frame > is into account. Ah, fooey. Brain fart. You're right. My bad... Keith