From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15601 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2002 00:04:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15592 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2002 00:04:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2002 00:04:00 -0000 Received: from makita.cygnus.com (makita.sfbay.redhat.com [192.168.30.83]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA27469; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (keiths@localhost) by makita.cygnus.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.6.4) with ESMTP id RAA25615; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:03:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: makita.cygnus.com: keiths owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 17:05:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: To: Andrew Cagney cc: Mo DeJong , Subject: Re: [Patch] add implementation of stack-info-frame MI command In-Reply-To: <3D408BD9.90403@ges.redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00525.txt.bz2 On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > See my post to GDB@. I think this should be handled as an event and not > as a command. As Mo has implemented, -stack-info-frame would return the very same information as -stack-info-depth. I always thought that -stack-info-frame would give information about the current (or given) frame, i.e., saved pc, saved registers, etc. > The user entering a command like ``up'' needs to trigger the event > notification anyway. As for "up"/"down"/"frame" commands to the console, I have already implemented a notification event on the "mi branch". Keith