From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9443 invoked by alias); 17 May 2002 21:47:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9429 invoked from network); 17 May 2002 21:47:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 May 2002 21:47:49 -0000 Received: from makita.cygnus.com (makita.sfbay.redhat.com [192.168.30.83]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA12025 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 14:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (keiths@localhost) by makita.cygnus.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.6.4) with ESMTP id OAA04758 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 14:47:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: makita.cygnus.com: keiths owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 14:47:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: [RFC/MI] Renumber enum mi_cmd_result In-Reply-To: <3CE5799A.30605@cygnus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00763.txt.bz2 On Fri, 17 May 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Check catch_exceptions(). The whole catch_errors() argument problem has > been fixed. I'd consider a switch to catch_exceptions obvious and I can > see only one call. I thought you might say that! I'm already rewriting it... (Just trying to keep you on your toes. :-) Keith