From: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
To: <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: [RFA] create_file_handler thinko?
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 15:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0205131451430.25762-100000@makita.cygnus.com> (raw)
Hi,
According to comments in create_file_handler, calling create_file_handler
twice with the same fd should result in only a modification of the
parameters for the fd.
However, the source doesn't read this way. This patch changes
create_file_handler so that it behaves in a way consistent with its
comments.
Of course, if the comments are wrong, this patch is also completely
wrong...
Keith
ChangeLog
2002-05-13 Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
* event-loop.c (create_file_handler): Don't do anything but
update data when we are given a fd which we are already
monitoring.
Patch (mostly whitespace)
Index: event-loop.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/event-loop.c,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -p -r1.17 event-loop.c
*** event-loop.c 27 Nov 2001 04:15:09 -0000 1.17
--- event-loop.c 13 May 2002 21:59:26 -0000
*************** create_file_handler (int fd, int mask, h
*** 494,544 ****
file_ptr->ready_mask = 0;
file_ptr->next_file = gdb_notifier.first_file_handler;
gdb_notifier.first_file_handler = file_ptr;
- }
- file_ptr->proc = proc;
- file_ptr->client_data = client_data;
- file_ptr->mask = mask;
! if (use_poll)
! {
#ifdef HAVE_POLL
! gdb_notifier.num_fds++;
! if (gdb_notifier.poll_fds)
! gdb_notifier.poll_fds =
! (struct pollfd *) xrealloc (gdb_notifier.poll_fds,
! (gdb_notifier.num_fds
! * sizeof (struct pollfd)));
! else
! gdb_notifier.poll_fds =
! (struct pollfd *) xmalloc (sizeof (struct pollfd));
! (gdb_notifier.poll_fds + gdb_notifier.num_fds - 1)->fd = fd;
! (gdb_notifier.poll_fds + gdb_notifier.num_fds - 1)->events = mask;
! (gdb_notifier.poll_fds + gdb_notifier.num_fds - 1)->revents = 0;
#else
! internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
! "use_poll without HAVE_POLL");
#endif /* HAVE_POLL */
! }
! else
! {
! if (mask & GDB_READABLE)
! FD_SET (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[0]);
else
! FD_CLR (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[0]);
! if (mask & GDB_WRITABLE)
! FD_SET (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[1]);
! else
! FD_CLR (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[1]);
! if (mask & GDB_EXCEPTION)
! FD_SET (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[2]);
! else
! FD_CLR (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[2]);
! if (gdb_notifier.num_fds <= fd)
! gdb_notifier.num_fds = fd + 1;
}
}
/* Remove the file descriptor FD from the list of monitored fd's:
--- 494,545 ----
file_ptr->ready_mask = 0;
file_ptr->next_file = gdb_notifier.first_file_handler;
gdb_notifier.first_file_handler = file_ptr;
! if (use_poll)
! {
#ifdef HAVE_POLL
! gdb_notifier.num_fds++;
! if (gdb_notifier.poll_fds)
! gdb_notifier.poll_fds =
! (struct pollfd *) xrealloc (gdb_notifier.poll_fds,
! (gdb_notifier.num_fds
! * sizeof (struct pollfd)));
! else
! gdb_notifier.poll_fds =
! (struct pollfd *) xmalloc (sizeof (struct pollfd));
! (gdb_notifier.poll_fds + gdb_notifier.num_fds - 1)->fd = fd;
! (gdb_notifier.poll_fds + gdb_notifier.num_fds - 1)->events = mask;
! (gdb_notifier.poll_fds + gdb_notifier.num_fds - 1)->revents = 0;
#else
! internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
! "use_poll without HAVE_POLL");
#endif /* HAVE_POLL */
! }
else
! {
! if (mask & GDB_READABLE)
! FD_SET (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[0]);
! else
! FD_CLR (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[0]);
! if (mask & GDB_WRITABLE)
! FD_SET (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[1]);
! else
! FD_CLR (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[1]);
! if (mask & GDB_EXCEPTION)
! FD_SET (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[2]);
! else
! FD_CLR (fd, &gdb_notifier.check_masks[2]);
! if (gdb_notifier.num_fds <= fd)
! gdb_notifier.num_fds = fd + 1;
! }
}
+
+ file_ptr->proc = proc;
+ file_ptr->client_data = client_data;
+ file_ptr->mask = mask;
}
/* Remove the file descriptor FD from the list of monitored fd's:
next reply other threads:[~2002-05-13 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-13 15:01 Keith Seitz [this message]
2002-05-13 20:00 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-05-14 8:22 ` Keith Seitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.GSO.4.33.0205131451430.25762-100000@makita.cygnus.com \
--to=keiths@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox