From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29183 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2002 06:44:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29157 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2002 06:44:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2002 06:44:08 -0000 Received: from cse.cygnus.com (cse.sfbay.redhat.com [205.180.230.236]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA01563; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 23:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (keiths@localhost) by cse.cygnus.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.6.4) with ESMTP id XAA02469; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 23:37:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: cse.cygnus.com: keiths owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 23:44:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz X-X-Sender: To: Jim Ingham cc: Subject: Re: Nother little one, this time in varobj.c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00396.txt.bz2 On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Jim Ingham wrote: > BTW, I am not sure why it is necessary to call reinit_frame_cache here. > Keith, do you remember why this was necessary? It is inefficient, > especially if you are evaluating a bunch of variables that are fairly > high up on the stack. But since I don't remember why this was done, I > am reluctant to just change it outright... I haven't a clue, actually. When I originally wrote varobj for Insight, it did not allow varobjs to change frames dynamically, as it does now. Presumably, this was all added at the same time. (Or I've forgotten all about it...) Keith