From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10230 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2002 11:14:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10212 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2002 11:14:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO herndon4.his.com) (216.194.192.71) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2002 11:14:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (dickey@localhost) by herndon4.his.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA23641; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 06:14:06 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 03:14:00 -0000 From: "Thomas E. Dickey" Reply-To: To: Samuel Tardieu cc: , , , , , Subject: Re: (toplevel) introduce host subdir configuration in Makefile In-Reply-To: <87y97644ja.fsf@inf.enst.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Samuel Tardieu wrote: > >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Dickey writes: > > Thomas> arguable (as usual). 2.13 didn't pretend to support parallel > Thomas> make. 2.5x pretends to, but (as you note) config.cache isn't > Thomas> handled. So it appears more as a bug in 2.5x > > It looks like you have misunderstood what parallel configuration > process meant: only config.status is supposed to be run in parallel in > the same directory, and config.status has never ever used > config.cache. no - I understood the problem. you're free to make up definitions for your words, and I'm free to ignore you. -- T.E.Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net