From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26240 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2002 23:17:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26231 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2002 23:17:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Nov 2002 23:17:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 47157 invoked by uid 20157); 12 Nov 2002 23:17:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Nov 2002 23:17:36 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:17:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-X-Sender: hp@dair.pair.com To: Rob Savoye cc: bug-dejagnu@gnu.org, Subject: Re: [Bug-dejagnu] [RFA:] DejaGNU patch: Change -I to -isystem for testsuite. In-Reply-To: <20021112133532.E29599@welcomehome.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00357.txt.bz2 On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Rob Savoye wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2002 at 11:33:41PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > BTW, does anybody have an idea why gcc/testsuite/site.exp is > > completely ineffective? Changing s/-I/-isystem/g in the > > site.exp in gcc/Makefile.in has no effect; in fact it doesn't > > seem to be used at all. > > I believe the site.exp that is actually read in is from the > gcc directory, not the gcc/testsuite one. Neither, actually: they're both generated from gcc/Makefile.in. > > Ok to commit to sources.redhat.com/dejagnu? > > Looks ok to me. I'll check this into savannah after I merge in the patch. Thanks. brgds, H-P