Re: [PATCH] remote: Avoid unwanted shlib internal BPs When debugging Linux kernel or u-boot with Abatron BDI emulator an error occurs:

[Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>]

Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote on 2012/06/01 16:55:48:

> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> To: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@transmode.se>,
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: 2012/06/01 16:56
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote: Avoid unwanted shlib internal BPs When debugging Linux kernel or u-boot with Abatron BDI emulator an error occurs:
>
> On 06/01/2012 03:53 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>
> > Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote on 2012/06/01 16:40:38:
> >>
> >> On 06/01/2012 03:38 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >>
> >>>> GDB has no special knowledge of the Linux kernel, nor of u-boot.
> >>>>> A GNU/Linux targeted GDB (*-*-linux-gnu) recognizes, and knows how to
> >>>>> debug user space applications.  If the kernel binary or the u-boot binary
> >>>>> look very much like GNU/Linux user space programs, the *-*-linux-gnu targeted
> >>>>> GDB will assume that's what they are.  If you used a bare metal elf/eabi
> >>>>> targeted GDB, which is really what those programs are, you'd not see this.
> >>>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Yes you would, the error comes from this in solibsvr4.c:
> >>
> >>> static const char * const bkpt_names[] =
> >>> {
> >>>   "_start",
> >>>   "__start",
> >>>   "main",
> >>>   NULL
> >>> };
> >>
> >>
> >> No you wouldn't, because solib-svr4 is not used (or even compiled in)
> >> on a bare metal targeted GDB.
> >
> > One suggesting I got is to wrap this last test with
> > if (interp_name) /* Check if there is a ld.so at all */
> >     if (!current_inferior ()->attach_flag)
> >      ...
> >     }
> >
> > What do you think about that?
>
>
> That makes sense.

Done, see new patch on list