From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-60995-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5476 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2009 16:23:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 5466 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jan 2009 16:23:17 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from outdoor.onevision.de (HELO outdoor.onevision.de) (212.77.172.51)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:23:13 +0000
Received: from sanders.onevision.de (moonrace [212.77.172.62]) 	by outdoor.onevision.de (8.14.3/8.13.7/ROSCH/DDB) with ESMTP id n08GMgC2009578; 	Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:22:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <200901081618.n08GI4lw012422@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] convert a host address to a string
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <OFBDE5015B.92ADB522-ONC1257538.0059DAD5-C1257538.0059F7F0@onevision.de>
From: Kai Tietz <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:23:00 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2

Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> wrote on 08.01.2009 17:18:05:

> > From: Kai Tietz <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com>
> > Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:35:11 +0100
> > 
> > Please be aware that %llx isn't valid for x86_64 windows (as it isn't 
for 
> > 32-bit standard). The options 'I' or 'I64' have to be used for those 
> > targets (at least for _WIN64).
> 
> Are you serious?  Wow, that's unbelievable.  %llx is defined by ISO
> C99, and you're saying that even the 64-bit editions of Windows that
> were introduced several years after the standard was ratified (and
> almost a decade after the first drafts were circulated) don't
> implement that bit of the standard?
> 

Sadly, yes. IIRC they implemented it in their newer runtimes, but it 
didn't made it into msvcrt.dll even on 64-bit systems.

Cheers,
Kai

|  (\_/)  This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny
| (='.'=) into your signature to help him gain
| (")_(") world domination.