From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1150 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2005 10:39:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 1142 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Dec 2005 10:39:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate4.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate4.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 10:39:53 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate4.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jB9AdRLs131452 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:39:28 GMT Received: from d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.229]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id jB9AdQpY169116 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:39:26 +0100 Received: from d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jB9AdPIx027090 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:39:25 +0100 Received: from d12ml068.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12ml068.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.164.163]) by d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id jB9AdPbP027085; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 11:39:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised To: Wu Zhou Cc: drow@false.org, eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl Message-ID: From: Ulrich Weigand Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 14:34:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00165.txt.bz2 Wu Zhou wrote on 09.12.2005 03:12:04: > Thanks a lot. That is a very good sample. But I see that you didn't > implement to_stopped_data_address either. Do you think it is mandatory? It > seems that it is mainly used in rwatch and awatch. I don't implement this because our hardware simply does not provide that information. This is why a couple of the watchpoint testcases are currently failing on s390 ... (We don't have read/access watchpoints anyway.) Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards Ulrich Weigand -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand Linux for S/390 Design & Development IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen Phone: +49-7031/16-3727 --- Email: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com