From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Anthony Green" <green@redhat.com>
To: "Jim Blandy" <jimb@cygnus.com>, <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: abstract C++ ABI dependencies
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 12:20:00 -0000
Message-id: <NEBBKJDPKLNNENPPIHCPCEJILBAA.green@redhat.com>
References: <20010424173019.9FAC85E9CB@zwingli.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-04/msg00223.html

Jim wrote in gdb/jv-typeprint.c:
> ! 		  is_full_physname_constructor =
> is_constructor_name (physname) != 0 || is_destructor_name (physname) != 0;

Actually, it didn't look exactly like that.  My mailer is munging it because
it was too long.  The patch is fine by me as long as the formatting is
changed.

I also find "is_constructor_name (physname) || is_destructor_name
(physname)" easier to read, but to each his own...

Thanks!

AG