Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aktemur, Tankut Baris" <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>,
	Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>,
	"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] gdb: notify of inferior switch when needed from 'thread' command
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 16:12:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <IA0PR11MB7307BB4B5B3CC3A354289261C4C7A@IA0PR11MB7307.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87plau4xvj.fsf@redhat.com>

Hello Andrew,

> I'd also like to draw you attention to the gdb/mi/* changes in this
> patch as you didn't give your thoughts on that aspect of the change.
> 
> That part of the patch handles the case where a user as an MI and CLI
> interpreter running, and the inferior/thread changes as a result of an
> MI action.
> 
> In this case, the MI action might be a click, or miss-click in a UI, or
> might even be some automated action by the MI frontend that the user
> didn't (knowingly) perform.  In this case, currently, the CLI will
> receive a thread/frame change notification (i.e. the CLI interpreter
> prints the new thread and frame), but the inferior notification is
> missing.  My patch changed GDB so the CLI would (when appropriate) also
> receive an inferior changed notification, and so also print a "Switching
> to inferior..." line.
> 
> Surely in that case, your "the inferior change is known from the
> command" argument doesn't apply, right?
> 
> But then there's a whole argument about consistency.  If I change
> inferior and thread via the MI the CLI gets a "Switching to inferior"
> line, but if I do the same switch via the CLI, I wouldn't.  Which I
> dislike.

Something is not clear to me.  Suppose there is an internal switch because
of a breakpoint hit.  E.g. My selected thread is 2.2.  I resume all inferiors.
Thread 1.1 hits a breakpoint.  GDB switches.  With your patch, the output is

  [Switching to Thread 0x7ffff7d85740 (LWP 1279258)]

  Thread 1.1 "test" hit Breakpoint ...

Should we have seen a "Switching to inferior 1 ...", too?

Best regards,
-Baris

> Anyway, I still feel like this change is the right thing to do.  I'd
> love to hear your thoughts on the points I've raised.
> 
> Clearly though, my original patch did a poor job of explaining that the
> extra "Switching to inferior" line would only appear when necessary, so
> if I can get you on board with this change, I'll rewrite the commit
> message to make that _much_ clearer.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew


Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Dornacher Straße 1, 85622 Feldkirchen, Germany
Tel: +49 89 991 430, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Harry Demas, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Yin Chong Sorrell
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Seat: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht München HRB 186928

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-03 16:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-08  8:48 Andrew Burgess
2025-10-09 18:59 ` Pedro Alves
2025-10-10 14:47   ` Andrew Burgess
2025-11-03 16:12     ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris [this message]
2025-11-03 17:57       ` Andrew Burgess
2026-01-06 13:37     ` Andrew Burgess
2026-01-26 13:58 ` [PATCHv2] " Andrew Burgess
2026-03-17 19:41   ` Guinevere Larsen
2026-03-18 14:34     ` Andrew Burgess
2026-04-17 14:54   ` [PATCHv3] " Andrew Burgess

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=IA0PR11MB7307BB4B5B3CC3A354289261C4C7A@IA0PR11MB7307.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com \
    --cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox