From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31397 invoked by alias); 2 May 2012 15:56:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 31387 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2012 15:56:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from imr4.ericy.com (HELO imr4.ericy.com) (198.24.6.9) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2012 15:55:54 +0000 Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id q42FtkPI017412; Wed, 2 May 2012 10:55:48 -0500 Received: from EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.69]) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) with mapi; Wed, 2 May 2012 11:55:44 -0400 From: Marc Khouzam To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" , "'Stan Shebs'" CC: "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 15:56:00 -0000 Subject: RE: GDB/MI and ">" prompts Message-ID: References: <83vckviv3b.fsf@gnu.org> <20120419154853.GM25623@adacore.com> <83sjfzitxx.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4vjitnj.fsf@gnu.org> <20120419185329.GO25623@adacore.com> <83mx67ikxm.fsf@gnu.org> <837gx7hhxa.fsf@gnu.org> <83lilg6ysn.fsf@gnu.org> <4F9EBD0D.2090701@earthlink.net> <83k40x5eq4.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83k40x5eq4.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org=20 > [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Eli Zaretskii > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 1:09 PM > To: Stan Shebs > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Subject: Re: GDB/MI and ">" prompts >=20 > > Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:25:49 -0700 > > From: Stan Shebs > >=20 > > It seems logically correct... Did you try Eclipse? This is=20 > the kind of=20 > > thing that CDT's MI and console bits can be sensitive to,=20 > even though=20 > > it's not supposed to be. :-) If you haven't tried it, doing some=20 > > breakpoint commands (both from breakpoint window and=20 > console window)=20 > > with any recent released Eclipse should be a sufficient sniff test. > >=20 > > If Eclipse is good, then this is OK to commit. >=20 > Thanks. No, I didn't try Eclipse, and I don't have it handy. Perhaps > someone else could. I actually had to add special code in Eclipse to handle some secondary=20 prompt weirdness of GDB, so I think it is worth trying your patch with Eclipse. I don't have time right now, but I should this week. Feel free to ping me in a couple of days if I haven't replied yet. Marc