From: Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
To: "'Joel Brobecker'" <brobecker@adacore.com>,
"'Tom Tromey'" <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: Assertion failure because of missing inferior
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC572E9D937F@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101214150430.GV2596@adacore.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
> [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Joel Brobecker
> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 10:05 AM
> To: Tom Tromey
> Cc: Marc Khouzam; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: Assertion failure because of missing inferior
>
> > Marc> 2010-12-10 Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@ericsson.com>
> > Marc> * mi/mi-main.c (mi_cmd_remove_inferior): Don't
> delete current inferior.
> > Marc> (get_other_inferior): New.
> >
> > I think this is ok for the 7.2 branch, assuming Joel didn't do the
> > release already :)
>
> I'll wait for the go ahead from you guys - I get confused with the
> various emails...
So, although I feel that this patch is good, it seems to be
only a first step in getting 'remove-inferior' to work. Once
I have this patch applied, I'm getting further but hitting
another crash. I'm still working on a patch for that. I don't
think the current patch is going to help 7.2.1 unless the other
crash is also fixed, so I'll wait before committing it.
I guess I have just a little more time, until the issue below
(watchpoint-related patch) is ready, to try to fix the latest
crash. I'll do my best.
Thanks
Marc
> There is also a watchpoint-related patch (from Pedro) which
> Jan pointed
> out. It looks a little riskier than the typical patch, but it fixes
> crashes and has been in HEAD for 4 months now. So I suggested the
> possibility of maybe putting it in, if we don't know of any issue that
> this patch caused since putting it in HEAD....
>
> --
> Joel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-14 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-04 19:11 Marc Khouzam
2010-12-07 18:54 ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-08 1:38 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-12-10 19:59 ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-10 20:21 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-12-10 21:01 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-12-10 21:38 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-12-14 14:50 ` Tom Tromey
2010-12-14 15:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-12-14 15:31 ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-15 5:12 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-12-14 20:00 ` Marc Khouzam [this message]
2010-12-15 15:57 ` [Python] Segfault when clearing pspace (was: RE: Assertion failure because of missing inferior) Marc Khouzam
2010-12-16 21:26 ` [Python] Segfault when clearing pspace Tom Tromey
2010-12-18 2:13 ` Marc Khouzam
2010-12-18 2:19 ` Assertion failure because of missing inferior Marc Khouzam
2010-12-14 14:49 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F7CE05678329534C957159168FA70DEC572E9D937F@EUSAACMS0703.eamcs.ericsson.se \
--to=marc.khouzam@ericsson.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox