From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-128127-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 32348 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2015 13:51:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 32335 invoked by uid 89); 16 Dec 2015 13:51:12 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com
Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:51:11 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960E02EE0038;	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:51:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id a0MGJL7450u3; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:51:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dhcp-guest-231.act-europe.fr (dhcp-guest-231.act-europe.fr [10.10.127.231])	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60A442EE0011;	Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:51:08 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Subject: Re: cortex-m xml register descriptions for m-system
From: Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4BF-Tk0yEgjpf=ujaLJbrFtkp_ujKYv4rpjtqTBdYXMYFQ4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:51:00 -0000
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F678ABCB-7AD9-48F2-AC4B-713542287C4A@adacore.com>
References: <CAF4BF-RuPwFWfDa2Sp7MzYjF8bo1K3xb=jMThSpK4T7gTe+whQ@mail.gmail.com> <566F108D.1000401@redhat.com> <CAF4BF-TUH0V4=YY07u9n3q=dMecbjMr9cOrEm=2BDXeP3HrDQQ@mail.gmail.com> <566F5B1A.8040703@redhat.com> <CAF4BF-Tk0yEgjpf=ujaLJbrFtkp_ujKYv4rpjtqTBdYXMYFQ4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Friedt <chrisfriedt@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2


> On 15 Dec 2015, at 16:35, Christopher Friedt <chrisfriedt@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>=20
> Just so we can have consensus, please indicate what you think is the
> best solution - Pedro, Yao, & Tristan.
>=20
> Based on Tristan's feedback as well, it confirms that these registers
> are necessary for DWARF handling.

Not sure about that.  To my understanding, DWARF doesn=E2=80=99t need to re=
fer
to psp or msp.

Tristan.