From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24195 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2003 15:40:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24166 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2003 15:40:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailgw3a.lmco.com) (192.35.35.7) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Aug 2003 15:40:38 -0000 Received: from emss04g01.ems.lmco.com ([166.17.13.122]) by mailgw3a.lmco.com (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h7LFeb929314; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:40:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.lmco.com by lmco.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #40649) id <0HJZ006017JOCI@lmco.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:40:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from EMSS04I00.us.lmco.com ([166.17.13.135]) by lmco.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #40649) with ESMTP id <0HJZ0035I7JNHO@lmco.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:40:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from EMSS04M11.us.lmco.com ([144.219.10.27]) by EMSS04I00.us.lmco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Thu, 21 Aug 2003 11:40:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 15:40:00 -0000 From: "Newman, Mark (N-Superior Technical Resource Inc)" Subject: RE: FW: bug ???? To: Andrew Cagney , Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Aug 2003 15:40:35.0787 (UTC) FILETIME=[905AF1B0:01C367FA] X-SW-Source: 2003-08/txt/msg00365.txt.bz2 I have no problem with either way. My role was not of much significance in this patch. I have not received any assignment paperwork. Mark -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Cagney [mailto:ac131313@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 11:28 AM To: Michael Snyder Cc: Newman, Mark (N-Superior Technical Resource Inc); gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: FW: bug ???? > 2003-08-15 Mark Newman > > * tracepoint.c (trace_dump_command): Trace break address > is subject to DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK. Michael, I'd use a change log like: YYYY-MM-DD Michael Snyder ... * tracepoint.c (..): ... Problem reported by Mark Newman. so that it more exactly reflects the fact that you, and not Mark, made the change (while still giving due credit) (this makes auditing much much easier). I've sent Mark the relevant paper work for an assignment (but that isn't needed here). Andrew