From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26124 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2008 08:34:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 26093 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2008 08:34:57 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 08:34:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C217E290003; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:34:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HAIwVdKnKg8U; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:34:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384B2290001; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:34:15 +0100 (CET) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Message-Id: From: Tristan Gingold To: Mark Kettenis In-Reply-To: <200811101858.mAAIwoKj009428@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [RFA] Darwin Port (Part 1: changes in common files) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:11:00 -0000 References: <6C04CB59-A202-4D7E-B2DA-97DAE3F3ED85@adacore.com> <200811101858.mAAIwoKj009428@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2 On Nov 10, 2008, at 7:58 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote: > I know Apple doesn't want you to run their OS on non-Apple hardware, > but I don't think we should reinforce that standpoint. Could we just > match *-*-dawrwin*? Sure! Note that you can run darwin on any hardware (as it is open source) > Also, I'm a bit confused by the Darwin vs. MacOS X naming game. I > realize it would be quite a bit of work, but to me it would make sense > to exclusively use Darwin in comments, function names and file names > (appropriately capitalized). Ok, not fun but better earlier than later. > Why do you need both Darwin and Darwin64? We don't do this for other > operating systems that have both a 32-bit and a 64-bit variant. Ok, will learn how to do with only one osabi. Tristan.