From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22781 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2012 10:16:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 22773 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2012 10:16:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:16:28 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkvEJ-0001cT-Ck; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:16:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:27:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Kevin Pouget CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Kevin Pouget on Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:47:55 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add bp_location to Python interface Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <83r4z8eqoa.fsf@gnu.org> <83k44zeaui.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00347.txt.bz2 > From: Kevin Pouget > Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:47:55 +0100 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, pmuldoon@redhat.com > > >> +Return a tuple containing a sequence of @code{gdb.BpLocation} objects > >> +(see below) associated with this breakpoint.  A breakpoint with no location > >> +is a pending breakpoint (@xref{Set Breaks, , pending breakpoints}). > >                            ^^^^^ > > Still an @xref... > > sorry, I missed it in the first run ... See below, it sounds like I totally failed to explain myself in this matter. > +@defun gdb.locations () > +Return a tuple containing a sequence of @code{gdb.BpLocation} objects > +(see below) associated with this breakpoint. A breakpoint with no location > +is a pending breakpoint (@xref{Set Breaks, , pending breakpoints}). This @xref should become @pxref, because the cross reference is in parentheses (that's the `p' part of `pxref') and is not a complete sentence. The other @xref that you changed to @pxref should be left alone. > -become invisible to the user. @xref{Breakpoints In Python}, for further > +become invisible to the user. @pxref{Breakpoints In Python}, for further > details about this argument. This should be @xref, as it is not in parentheses and is a complete sentence. Thanks, and sorry for my evidently unclear wording.