From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-86315-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19537 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2011 11:16:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 19517 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2011 11:16:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:16:34 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1RcbCr-0004LJ-Qm; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 06:16:33 -0500
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:41:00 -0000
Message-Id: <E1RcbCr-0004LJ-Qm@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
CC: dje@google.com, brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@redhat.com,	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20111219104959.GA8788@host2.jankratochvil.net> (message from Jan	Kratochvil on Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:49:59 +0100)
Subject: Re: [doc patch] gdbint: XFAIL vs. KFAIL  [Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs]
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <m3wra5ebvq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20111209215319.GA5132@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111210160145.GA7261@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111211024742.GN21915@adacore.com> <20111211092552.GA14574@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111211124213.GO21915@adacore.com> <20111214185650.GA8485@host2.jankratochvil.net> <CADPb22QRAqkv9pSJEy5-s33a5D13XAOcaShPU=OVHhQBYap1qg@mail.gmail.com> <20111214194220.GA24281@host2.jankratochvil.net> <E1Rb3lK-0007dC-Ld@fencepost.gnu.org> <20111219104959.GA8788@host2.jankratochvil.net>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00634.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:49:59 +0100
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: dje@google.com, brobecker@adacore.com, tromey@redhat.com,        gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 06:21:46 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > +Known problem of @value{GDBN} itself.  You must specify the @value{GDBN} bug
> > > +report number.
> > 
> > Regarding the "must specify the bug report number": would it make
> > sense to show how to do that, e.g. with an example?
> 
> Is this OK for check-in?

Yes, thanks.