From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24740 invoked by alias); 12 Dec 2011 00:25:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 24550 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Dec 2011 00:25:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:24:54 +0000 Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZthN-0002IX-Bd; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:24:53 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:22:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20111212001426.GG2748@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker on Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:14:26 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFC] a script to update our gnulib import... Reply-to: ams@gnu.org References: <20111212001426.GG2748@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00339.txt.bz2 gdb/ChangeLog: * update-gnulib.sh: New script. Doesn't this do almost exactly what gnulib/build-aux/bootstrap does? Wouldn't it be better to use that?