From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-85196-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8843 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2011 06:00:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 8826 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2011 06:00:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 06:00:11 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1RQC42-0003HP-Gl; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:00:10 -0500
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 06:00:00 -0000
Message-Id: <E1RQC42-0003HP-Gl@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
CC: tromey@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com,	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to:	<CADPb22TED1ZqEXmAZeNngkJLm256sM35Q0pbXRyttnxMt=o+Tg@mail.gmail.com>	(message from Doug Evans on Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:46:23 -0800)
Subject: Re: [RFA, doc RFA] Avoid calling gdb_realpath if basenames are different
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20111106063053.B56F6246194@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>	<CADPb22ROw3_ES2sK+zfqpzShe9nZcxUvUf-ODOn6xYnUPJ+b2A@mail.gmail.com>	<8362irgi5w.fsf@gnu.org>	<CADPb22ReomSdvRUCJ=h4BD3KMpWgBsdtHDspXgGNr-iHvKh4aw@mail.gmail.com> <CADPb22TED1ZqEXmAZeNngkJLm256sM35Q0pbXRyttnxMt=o+Tg@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00373.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:46:23 -0800
> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> 
> Ok to check in?

The documentation parts are OK, thanks.