From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-83430-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11566 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2011 10:18:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 11558 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2011 10:18:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,TW_BJ
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:18:26 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1Qz4Lp-0007E1-Kl; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 06:18:25 -0400
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:01:00 -0000
Message-Id: <E1Qz4Lp-0007E1-Kl@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>
CC: tromey@redhat.com, pmuldoon@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to:	<CAPftXUKyge-BpB05PTn=5C=1HG6hgv8eS9rDYiZhooVMrrgZuQ@mail.gmail.com>	(message from Kevin Pouget on Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:17:51 +0200)
Subject: Re: [RFC - Python] New ObjFile event
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <AANLkTimybJtpUzy13FuLxQQMJfeWQuf3-cgqGmu23Bq5@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin=YO__Mz88HPFoT7a6_it5BxthnUdODJMs52eG@mail.gmail.com> <m362r3q9ih.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <AANLkTikmMVf7Lz=8ccdXeo1WG8k+ivHMCXkC7BkZkLNP@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=ObZFW+uoecfzvHhXr55zYZzSgX2ocJJrvXDv0@mail.gmail.com> <m339m4dgzr.fsf@redhat.com> <AANLkTima2Kk8C16hjj0kTtvsH9W33CbiE2y6wrVQXns5@mail.gmail.com> <m3ipt68mrs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <BANLkTi=NqJK6c+Cbvhc1M2fE=cS=5khSJg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPftXUKyge-BpB05PTn=5C=1HG6hgv8eS9rDYiZhooVMrrgZuQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2

> From: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:17:51 +0200
> Cc: pmuldoon@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
>  This event indicates that the inferior or one of its threads has received as
>  signal.  @code{gdb.SignalEvent} has the following attributes:
>  
> +@item events.newobjfile
> +Emits @code{gdb.NewObjFileEvent} which indicates that a new object-file has
> +been loaded by @value{GDBN}.
> +
> +During the callback, ``current objfile'' will be set to the new object file.
> +
>  @table @code
>  @defivar SignalEvent stop_signal
>  A string representing the signal received by the inferior.  A list of possible
> @@ -22949,10 +22955,10 @@ The following objfile-related functions are available in the

The addition doesn't look right: shouldn't it be _after_ the following
@table line?  events.newobjfile is an attribute of the same object as
stop_signal, right?

> +When auto-loading a Python script (@pxref{Auto-loading}) and during new
> +object-file callbacks, @value{GDBN} sets the ``current objfile'' to the

Why did you use "new" here?  New in relation to what?

Thanks.