From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-83428-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7430 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2011 10:08:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 7417 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Sep 2011 10:08:10 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:07:57 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1Qz4Ba-0006WJ-MV; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 06:07:50 -0400
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:12:00 -0000
Message-Id: <E1Qz4Ba-0006WJ-MV@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>
CC: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to:	<CAPftXUL-Q=aGpqG1e27A3HG7dkQ0oPUOMaSJ1_BaDwAoKg93Og@mail.gmail.com>	(message from Kevin Pouget on Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:44:39 +0200)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR/12691 Add the inferior to Python exited event
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <BANLkTikm-GqD0fubzfaoRUZCEz=JDy9GWg@mail.gmail.com> <m3oc3uurbw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <BANLkTinM3j98XgLoXeAk8TLxKSgh2QzYHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPftXUK6gm2dJvcHe8fu5gfxoObLenpXLdY2UmrHoDcn4uUHfA@mail.gmail.com> <83vctdej0n.fsf@gnu.org> <CAPftXUKNgH+ETVf6YNjsxhL3j6zus2zO2AqoC9VvoVoNJpTZzA@mail.gmail.com> <83ty8xebob.fsf@gnu.org> <m362ld79im.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83obz5ea7z.fsf@gnu.org> <CAPftXUL-Q=aGpqG1e27A3HG7dkQ0oPUOMaSJ1_BaDwAoKg93Og@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-09/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2

> From: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:44:39 +0200
> Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: Kevin Pouget <kevin.pouget@gmail.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:53:21 -0600
> >>
> >> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >>
> >> Eli> I'd still like to hear from someone "in the know" how is it possible
> >> Eli> that the exit code won't be available, but let's not block the commit
> >> Eli> on that behalf.
> >>
> >> It can happen at least on detach.
> >
> > Right, thanks.  Perhaps we should mention that in parentheses.
> >
> 
> do you want it to appear in my patch, something like
> 
> > Optional, will exist only in the case that the inferior exited with some status---i.e., not detached)
> 
> along with
> 
> >> +An integer representing the exit code which the inferior has returned.
> > I think we would be better off without that "has" word.
> 
> ?

No, I meant something like

  An integer representing the exit code, if available, which the
  inferior has returned.  (The exit code could be unavailable if, for
  example, @value{GDBN} detaches from the inferior.)