From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-83136-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28106 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2011 17:31:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 28098 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Aug 2011 17:31:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:31:38 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1QupOT-000684-3N; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:31:37 -0400
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:31:00 -0000
Message-Id: <E1QupOT-000684-3N@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
CC: sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20110820171728.GA26447@host1.jankratochvil.net> (message from	Jan Kratochvil on Sat, 20 Aug 2011 19:17:28 +0200)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Introduce header (jit-reader.h.in) and modify build system.
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <1312903509-25132-1-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <1312903509-25132-2-git-send-email-sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> <83fwlazja8.fsf@gnu.org> <20110820171728.GA26447@host1.jankratochvil.net>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00396.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 19:17:28 +0200
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: Sanjoy Das <sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:39:11 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I understand that jit.c will be compiled unconditionally on the x86
> > architectures, is that right?  If so, would it be possible to rename
> > jit-header.h.in to jit-header.in, or some other name that doesn't
> > violate the file-naming restrictions on 8+3 (a.k.a. DOS) filesystems?
> 
> Do you have some recent successful build of DJGPP on such 8+3 platform?

I don't want to break that possibility if we can avoid that.

> jit-header.h.in is the only right name to substitute for
> jit-header.h

How about jit-header.in?  Emacs uses config.in to produce config.h.