From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-81998-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5829 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2011 11:58:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 5814 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jul 2011 11:58:39 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:58:25 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1Qdhn8-0000fE-TK; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 07:58:18 -0400
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:05:00 -0000
Message-Id: <E1Qdhn8-0000fE-TK@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: iam ahal <hal9000ed2k@gmail.com>
CC: pmuldoon@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com,	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to:	<CAA18ubJZK7w51Bmwvy7xYXPvHf7e=bbRbdBOqNvZA-PrXJpUsA@mail.gmail.com>	(message from iam ahal on Mon, 4 Jul 2011 15:14:08 +0400)
Subject: Re: [patch] GDB 7.2: new feature for "backtrace" that cuts path to file (remain filename)
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <BANLkTinD+9_Mkug8o2VhZ03L6XSriL_RKQ@mail.gmail.com>	<m3oc1kfheh.fsf@redhat.com>	<20110627160029.GF20676@adacore.com>	<m3sjqt67pe.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<m3mxh1oa8a.fsf@redhat.com>	<CAA18ubJ10sh3pPDLp4V44qY6r6hLU9RqyDi62KuAAtfXJY7Oug@mail.gmail.com>	<834o33qlm9.fsf@gnu.org> <CAA18ubJZK7w51Bmwvy7xYXPvHf7e=bbRbdBOqNvZA-PrXJpUsA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 15:14:08 +0400
> From: iam ahal <hal9000ed2k@gmail.com>
> Cc: pmuldoon@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com, brobecker@adacore.com, 
> 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> > But a larger concern is that GNU coding standards frown on using
> > "path" when you really mean "file name".  So I think we should rename
> > the option "basename" and the documentation should say
> >
> >  Same as @code{backtrace}, but print only the basename of the file.
> 
> Fixed. New doc's patch in attachment.

Thanks.

> What's about backtrace's argument name "nopath"?

I stated my suggestion.  I'll let Joel and others decide whether it is
mandatory to change to "basename" or somesuch.