From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-80056-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 4263 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2011 12:36:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 4228 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2011 12:36:42 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:36:36 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1Q4Y9z-0004UD-1Y; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:36:35 -0400
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:10:00 -0000
Message-Id: <E1Q4Y9z-0004UD-1Y@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <004701cbede4$0ee18c20$2ca4a460$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>	(pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr)
Subject: Re: [RFC] Missing sleep function for mingw hosts
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <004701cbede4$0ee18c20$2ca4a460$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg01169.txt.bz2

> From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:36:46 +0200
> 
> mingw does not have a sleep function in its library.
> This prevents currently successful compilation of
> mingw64 with --enable-targets=all option.

You say "mingw64" -- does that mean it does compile with mingw32?  If
so, how come it fails with the 64-bit build?

> I found that there is a substitute for sleep in gnulib:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=lib/sleep.c;hb=d60
> f3b0c6b0f93a601acd1cfd3923f94ca05abb0
> 
>   What is the rule to add new parts into gnulib subdirectory?
> Would inclusion of gnulib sleep.c source code
> be possible to fix the above problem?

I'd rather we had a replacement in win32-nat.c, instead of importing
gobs of gnulib stuff needed to provide such a trivial replacement.
gnulib is GPL, so we can simply copy the code into our sources.