From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-79606-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26931 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2011 12:52:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 26923 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Mar 2011 12:52:56 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:52:53 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71)	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)	id 1Pz7GV-0008AV-E5; Mon, 14 Mar 2011 08:52:51 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:06:00 -0000
Message-Id: <E1Pz7GV-0008AV-E5@fencepost.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
CC: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <000601cbe244$22256280$66702780$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>	(pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr)
Subject: Re: New ARI warning Sat Mar 12 01:53:29 UTC 2011
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20110312015329.GA20179@sourceware.org> <006701cbe220$a1a8dba0$e4fa92e0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <E1Pz5v6-0002FS-Es@fencepost.gnu.org> <201103141213.43979.pedro@codesourcery.com> <000601cbe244$22256280$66702780$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00719.txt.bz2

> From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:34:16 +0100
> 
> > "A function declaration should not have its name in column zero.  A
> > function definition should have its name in column zero."
> 
>   Thank you for finding this out...
> This is clearer than what I try to explain to Eli before.
> 
>   Eli, do you agree with this statement 
> in gdbint.textinfo or should it be modified?

That sentence says what one should _not_ do.  The issue in this thread
is what to do instead.

>   Would you like to enhance it to specify what to do if
> the whole function declaration
> TYPE NAME (PARAMS);
> doesn't fit into a 80 columns line?
> 
>  I am willing to adapt the ARI rule to such recommendations.

I suggested how to format that case.  If that suggestion is accepted,
I will change gdbint.texinfo accordingly.