From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8135 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2011 10:50:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 8126 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Feb 2011 10:50:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:50:34 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Prpp9-0003Xl-Nv; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 05:50:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:56:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, msnyder@vmware.com In-reply-to: <201102220916.51541.pedro@codesourcery.com> (message from Pedro Alves on Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:16:51 +0000) Subject: Re: [RFA] info break/watch/trace use get_number_or_range, take two Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4D62E5E0.9080105@vmware.com> <201102220916.51541.pedro@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00579.txt.bz2 > From: Pedro Alves > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:16:51 +0000 > Cc: Michael Snyder > > > add_info ("breakpoints", breakpoints_info, _("\ > > -Status of user-settable breakpoints, or breakpoint number NUMBER.\n\ > > +Status of user-settable breakpoints listed, or all breakpoints if no argument.\n\ > > "listed" doesn't sound obviously referring to the spec > you pass as argument to the command. "listed where? the > command itself is printing a list." was my thought. Is > there any other way to spell that? How about just losing the "listed" part? What important information does it convey in this context?