From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5903 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2010 06:44:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 5891 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2010 06:44:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:44:13 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NzOzi-0004wW-Dz; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:44:10 -0400 From: Eli Zaretskii To: "H.J. Lu" CC: pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (hjl.tools@gmail.com) Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix for Go32-v2 native woes Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <002a01cad517$d36eab90$7a4c02b0$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <001801cad593$8e70daf0$ab5290d0$%muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <83iq84xyoa.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6h0vtj6.fsf@gnu.org> Message-Id: Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:44:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00123.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:19:36 -0700 > From: "H.J. Lu" > Cc: pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > I have a followup patch on top of AVX gdb to support i386 without > SSE. I will submit it after AVX patches are checked in. Thank you. Btw, what happens with the register-related features you added if libexpat is not linked in? Do these features silently disappear (good) or break the build (bad) or cause fatal internal errors at run time (worse)? TIA