From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19542 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2010 14:09:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 19531 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2010 14:09:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:09:09 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NnBje-00037V-Qc; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:09:06 -0500 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: matthew.gretton-dann@arm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20100304133944.GA21490@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:39:47 -0500) Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Improve heuristic to guess the instruction state for the next PC when single-stepping Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1267703327.13980.13.camel@e102111-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20100304133944.GA21490@caradoc.them.org> Message-Id: Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:09:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00176.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:39:47 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > > (arm_get_next_pc): Modified to use arm_get_next_pc_raw (). > > At some point we were asked to not use " ()" to indicate functions By RMS, no doubt. He maintains that `foo ()' looks like a call to `foo' with no arguments, which is usually not what you want to express.