From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-68584-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22639 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2009 11:58:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 22631 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2009 11:58:21 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:57:17 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) 	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) 	id 1NCXXf-0007UP-3z; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:57:15 -0500
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
CC: tromey@redhat.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <8ac60eac0911222343gbec8320q4d2de9a6fc09c461@mail.gmail.com> 	(message from Paul Pluzhnikov on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:43:51 -0800)
Subject: Re: [patch] Allow "disassemble 'Foo::bar(char *)'"
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20091114001022.A0A0776CDD@ppluzhnikov.mtv.corp.google.com> 	 <8ac60eac0911161028of5f2352lf1857db7a46a94b2@mail.gmail.com> 	 <8ac60eac0911191539w4245739ka6405ba072b79395@mail.gmail.com> 	 <m3pr7d9ket.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> 	 <8ac60eac0911201642y138489ffvab73550bfa72a89d@mail.gmail.com> 	 <20091121005931.GA24143@caradoc.them.org> 	 <8ac60eac0911201708k2c9bc062w9c34765e03b83566@mail.gmail.com> 	 <83lji0p96p.fsf@gnu.org> 	 <8ac60eac0911211838g44519802t5f082446d5494f2d@mail.gmail.com> 	 <83skc7npzo.fsf@gnu.org> <8ac60eac0911222343gbec8320q4d2de9a6fc09c461@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <E1NCXXf-0007UP-3z@fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:58:00 -0000
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00491.txt.bz2

> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:43:51 -0800
> From: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
> Cc: tromey@redhat.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> >> The comma separates expressions, and expressions may contain
> >> {leading,trailing,in the middle} whitespace.
> 
> > I still think that the whitespace should be explicitly mentioned.
> 
> I am having hard time coming up with a description that makes sense
> and doesn't restate the obvious :-(
> "When parsing address expression(s), non-quoted whitespace is ignored."
> 
> Could you suggest what you would like to see there?

How about

  When two arguments are given, they should be separated by a comma,
  possibly surrounded by whitespace.