From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-64711-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 814 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2009 01:04:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 799 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2009 01:04:47 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:04:41 +0000
Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) 	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) 	id 1MIuRD-0001QO-Dj; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:04:39 -0400
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
CC: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20090622205616.GD7766@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker 	on Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:56:16 -0700)
Subject: Re: [PING][RFA-v2] Fix a windows bug if two watchpoints are used
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <E1MBzlp-0003sy-TM@fencepost.gnu.org> <000601c9e4a3$b2f2f980$18d8ec80$@u-strasbg.fr> <E1MC3RX-0003Di-Hj@fencepost.gnu.org> <000001c9e4de$6e550cb0$4aff2610$@u-strasbg.fr> <E1MC77b-0001Ke-Vo@fencepost.gnu.org> <000301c9e4e6$b40c5d50$1c2517f0$@u-strasbg.fr> <E1MCAEM-0005ix-2I@fencepost.gnu.org> <001501c9e523$feffc1c0$fcff4540$@u-strasbg.fr> <E1MCEm0-0000bZ-9t@fencepost.gnu.org> <000301c9eed3$c7239d80$556ad880$@u-strasbg.fr> <20090622205616.GD7766@adacore.com>
Message-Id: <E1MIuRD-0001QO-Dj@fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:04:00 -0000
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00598.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:56:16 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: 'Eli Zaretskii' <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> >   Here also, I don't know if there still is an official
> > maintainer for i386-nat.c code, or is 
> > Eli's approval enough for this?
> 
> Eli is a Global Maintainer, so his approval is as good as any one else.

It's more than that in this case, actually: I originally wrote the x86
watchpoint support code, first just for DJGPP, then the more general
version for all x86 targets.

> I'm not sure that Eli's message was meant as an actual approval, though,
> so you might want to double-check with him.

I intentionally didn't say explicitly that I approve the code, because
I'd still want to hear Mark's approval.  Mark is traveling, IIRC, but
if he intends to take a look, I'd suggest to wait for that.  If Mark
says not to wait for him, you can see my mail as approval.