From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17345 invoked by alias); 23 Jun 2009 01:00:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 17332 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jun 2009 01:00:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_37,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:00:42 +0000 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MIuND-0001GU-HG; Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:00:31 -0400 From: Eli Zaretskii To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: brobecker@adacore.com, vladimir@codesourcery.com, chgenly@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20090622150201.GA10191@caradoc.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:02:01 -0400) Subject: Re: gdb.texinfo patch for -var-list-children (2) Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20090622031832.GA7766@adacore.com> <20090622150201.GA10191@caradoc.them.org> Message-Id: Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:00:00 -0000 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00597.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:02:01 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Joel Brobecker , vladimir@codesourcery.com, > chgenly@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com > > I (strongly) prefer unified Same here, but I don't want to impose my preferences on others. > As for patch, I recently discovered --unified-reject-files - very useful. Right, but that option is only available in the unofficial beta versions of Patch. Many users are unlikely to have it. The latest official release doesn't support such an option. (And then there's the issue with tools that use Patch as their back-end, and don't let you use this option easily.)